| From: | Andy <angelflow(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Intel 320 SSD info |
| Date: | 2011-08-24 17:23:49 |
| Message-ID: | 1314206629.63488.YahooMailNeo@web111301.mail.gq1.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
According to the specs for database storage:
"Random 4KB arites: Up to 600 IOPS"
Is that for real? 600 IOPS is *atrociously terrible* for an SSD. Not much faster than mechanical disks.
Has anyone done any performance benchmark of 320 used as a DB storage? Is it really that slow?
________________________________
From: David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 12:58 PM
Subject: [PERFORM] Intel 320 SSD info
Apologies if this has already been posted here (I hadn't seen it before today, and
can't find a previous post).
This will be of interest to anyone looking at using SSDs for database storage :
http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/solid-state-drives/ssd-320-enterprise-server-storage-application-specification-addendum.html
-- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Boreham | 2011-08-24 17:25:27 | Re: Intel 320 SSD info |
| Previous Message | David Boreham | 2011-08-24 17:23:15 | Re: Intel 320 SSD info |