Re: Extra check in 9.0 exclusion constraint unintended consequences

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda <acamari(at)verlet(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Extra check in 9.0 exclusion constraint unintended consequences
Date: 2011-08-12 20:26:58
Message-ID: 1313180818.8000.0.camel@jdavis-ux.asterdata.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 14:58 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Having thought about this a bit further, I'm coming around to the view
> that if it isn't worth adding this in master, it's not worth adding at
> all. I just don't think it's going to get any visibility as a
> back-branch only doc patch.

Fine with me.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2011-08-12 20:30:30 New copyright program
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2011-08-12 20:26:02 Re: VACUUM FULL versus system catalog cache invalidation