| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SSI error messages |
| Date: | 2011-07-27 20:19:22 |
| Message-ID: | 1311797962.5508.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On lör, 2011-07-16 at 15:01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, as I mentioned in the commit message, I've thought for some time
> that there were use cases for errdetail_internal. Whether these
> particular places in predicate.c use it or not doesn't affect that.
Looking at commit 1af37ec96d97722aeb527f5f43d6f6f2304f0861, not all of
these are strings that don't need to be translated. For example, you
can't assume that the translation of "%s: %s" is "%s: %s" or that the
translation of "%s (%x)" is "%s (%x)". I'll review those in detail when
I find some time, but some of them will probably have to be reverted.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-07-27 20:20:35 | Re: Check constraints on partition parents only? |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-07-27 20:17:43 | Re: Check constraints on partition parents only? |