From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID |
Date: | 2011-07-12 13:54:34 |
Message-ID: | 1310478598-sup-9088@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Magnus Hagander's message of mar jul 12 09:34:56 -0400 2011:
> > Agreed. On one level I like the sponsor message, but on the other
> > having "Sponsored by RedHat" on every Tom Lane item will get tiring.
> > ;-)
> >
> > Can we add text if the employer is _not_ the feature sponsor?
>
> That would be quite unfair to those who *do* employ committers....
> Basically you'd get credit only if you didn't employ a committer.
Well, that has worked well for my case -- I haven't ever credited my
employer, only those that have specifically hired us for a particular
patch. My employer gets a lot of "credit" in the form of email
signatures, like the one below ;-)
But I see your point and I will stick to whatever policy we come up with
(assuming we come up with one).
> This all becomes much easier if we keep the ads out of the commit
> messages, and stick to the technical side there. And find another
> venue for the other credit.
I'm open to ideas.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-07-12 14:13:42 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-07-12 13:34:56 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-07-12 13:56:30 | Re: per-column generic option |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-07-12 13:34:56 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID |