Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: marking old branches as no longer maintained

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: marking old branches as no longer maintained
Date: 2011-06-28 21:31:35
Message-ID: 1309296695.30757.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On tis, 2011-06-28 at 17:05 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > Couldn't you just put a text file on the build farm server with
> > recommended branches?
> 
> As I told Magnus, that gets ugly because of limitations in MinGW's SDK 
> perl. I suppose I could just not implement the feature for MinGW, but 
> I've tried damn hard not to make those sorts of compromises and I'm not 
> keen to start.

The buildfarm code can upload the build result via HTTP; why can't it
download a file via HTTP?


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2011-06-28 21:33:03
Subject: Re: SSI modularity questions
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2011-06-28 21:05:10
Subject: Re: marking old branches as no longer maintained

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group