Excerpts from Pavel Stehule's message of dom jun 26 13:10:13 -0400 2011:
> > I have touched next_token() and next_token_expand() a bit more, because
> > it seemed to me that they could be simplified further (the bit about
> > returning the comma in the token, instead of being a boolean return,
> > seemed strange). Please let me know what you think.
> I am thinking, so it is ok.
Thanks, I have pushed it. Brendan: thanks for the patch.
> I am not sure, if load_ident is correct. In load_hba you clean a
> previous context after successful processing. In load_ident you clean
> data on start. Is it ok?
Yeah, they are a bit inconsistent. I am uninclined to mess with it,
though. Right now it seems to me that the only way it could fail is if
you hit an out-of-memory or a similar problem. And if you hit that at
postmaster startup ... well ... I guess you have A Problem.
If somebody wants to submit a patch to fix that, be my guest.
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Kohei KaiGai||Date: 2011-06-28 20:11:59|
|Subject: Re: [v9.2] Fix leaky-view problem, part 1|
|Previous:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2011-06-28 19:59:29|
|Subject: Re: marking old branches as no longer maintained|