Re: pg_upgrade defaulting to port 25432

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade defaulting to port 25432
Date: 2011-06-27 21:50:03
Message-ID: 1309211403.17073.6.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On mån, 2011-06-27 at 14:34 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Robert Haas wrote:
> > > It's easier to read the patches if you do separate changes in separate
> > > patches. Anyway, I'm a bit nervous about this hunk:
> > >
> > > + if (old_cluster.port == DEF_PGUPORT)
> > > + pg_log(PG_FATAL, "When checking a live old server, "
> > > + "you must specify the old server's port number.\n");
> > >
> > > Is the implication here that I'm now going to need to specify more
> > > than 4 command-line options/environment variables for this to work?
> >
> > Yes, we don't inherit PGPORT anymore. Doing anything else was too
> > complex to explain in the docs.
>
> But only if you are running --check on a live server. Otherwise, we
> will just default to 50432 instead of 5432/PGPORT.

"When checking a live server, the built-in default port number or the
value of the environment variable PGPORT is used. But when performing
an upgrade, a different port number is used by default, namely 50432,
which can be overridden XXX [how?]"

Seems pretty clear to me, as long as that last bit is figured out.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Hunsaker 2011-06-27 22:25:24 add support for logging current role (what to review?)
Previous Message Gabriele Bartolini 2011-06-27 21:33:54 Dry Run mode for pg_archivecleanup