Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Crediting reviewers & bug-reporters in the release notes

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Crediting reviewers & bug-reporters in the release notes
Date: 2011-06-24 12:47:42
Message-ID: 1308919663.25848.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On tor, 2011-06-23 at 10:59 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> If we agree to make that credit goal overt, there is then little logic
> to avoid company names in the release notes, except it is more overt
> than it is now.  It is then a question of the level of credit given
> --- there is no logical prohibition.

I think we'd do both the readers of the actual release notes and those
who want to be credited a service if we separated those lists anyway.
We could just have a list of names after the change list, "The following
contributed to this release" or something like that.


In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Jaime CasanovaDate: 2011-06-25 09:46:01
Subject: is there any policy on event sponsors?
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2011-06-23 14:59:10
Subject: Re: Crediting reviewers & bug-reporters in the release notes

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group