"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> On Mon, 31 May 2010, Thom Brown wrote:
>> On 31 May 2010 09:33, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> We're currently at 4 weeks since last beta, with no new beta in sight.
>> My understanding was beta 2 would be out on 7th June. Is that changing?
> Yes, but Simon is correct in that 4-5 weeks between betas is a long time,
The reason it went like that is that (a) we had PGCon in there, and (b)
we had a set of security releases in there. Asking for another beta
to have happened is pointless. You might recall that I already *did*
ask that --- I wanted beta2 to happen concurrently with the security
releases --- and was turned down.
I find myself entirely unimpressed by proposals to make releases
according to some rigid schedule that takes no account of whether
packaging manpower is actually available.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Shrish Purohit||Date: 2010-05-31 15:09:18|
|Subject: Index only scans |
|Previous:||From: Pavel Stehule||Date: 2010-05-31 15:07:15|
|Subject: Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature|