Re: Please test peer (socket ident) auth on *BSD

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Please test peer (socket ident) auth on *BSD
Date: 2011-05-31 19:38:08
Message-ID: 1306870688.20912.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On tis, 2011-05-31 at 11:59 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> However, FreeBSD does have, and Debian/kFreeBSD does expose,
> getsockopt(LOCAL_PEERCRED), which turns out to be functionally
> equivalent to SO_PEERCRED: in particular, you can just call it and get
> the answer without having to fool with getting the far end to send a
> message. This is not only a whole lot cleaner than what we have, but
> also could be used to implement libpq's requirepeer option, which is
> currently unsupported on such platforms.
>
> So what I'm now thinking is we should rip out the control-message
> implementation altogether, and instead use LOCAL_PEERCRED. This is
> probably not something to back-patch, but it would make things a lot
> cleaner going forward.

Oh yes, no point in having complicated code that doesn't get exercised.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2011-05-31 20:07:03 Re: creating CHECK constraints as NOT VALID
Previous Message Florian Pflug 2011-05-31 19:28:50 Re: [PATCH] Bug in XPATH() if expression returns a scalar value