Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <kevin(dot)grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: Joe Abbate <jma(at)freedomcircle(dot)com>, Kim Bisgaard <kim+pg(at)alleroedderne(dot)adsl(dot)dk>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project
Date: 2011-05-31 16:59:33
Message-ID: 1306861081-sup-3040@alvh.no-ip.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Kevin Grittner's message of mar may 31 12:41:59 -0400 2011:
> Joe Abbate <jma(at)freedomcircle(dot)com> wrote:
>  
> > I assume a link such as
> > 
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2003-12/msg00046.php
> > 
> > would be easier to follow than
> > 
> > <20031205173035(dot)GA16741(at)wolff(dot)to>
>  
> The point is that the community seems to have reached a consensus
> that they would rather use this URL for the above message:
>  
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20031205173035.GA16741@wolff.to

Yeah, I keep dreaming that one day we will get rid of the silly monthly
partitioning of archives.  Those URLs will eventually be legacy --
existing ones will continue to work, but new messages will not (may not)
get them any longer.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Joe AbbateDate: 2011-05-31 17:10:32
Subject: Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2011-05-31 16:48:02
Subject: Re: creating CHECK constraints as NOT VALID

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group