Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kim Bisgaard <kim+pg(at)alleroedderne(dot)adsl(dot)dk>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Joe Abbate <jma(at)freedomcircle(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project
Date: 2011-05-31 13:19:23
Message-ID: 1306847963.6396.41.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On tis, 2011-05-31 at 08:44 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> 
> On 05/31/2011 06:41 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > We already have a search system that works reasonably well for the archives...
> >
> 
> I trust this weas a piece of sarcasm. I spoke to more than a few people 
> at pgcon and nobody had a good word to say about the search system on 
> the archives.

To some degree, the lack of a good search for the archives is half the
problem.  Not that a better search would be a replacement for a bug
tracker, but it would go a long way.


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2011-05-31 13:22:52
Subject: Re: Reducing overhead of frequent table locks
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2011-05-31 13:07:50
Subject: Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group