On tis, 2011-05-31 at 08:44 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 05/31/2011 06:41 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > We already have a search system that works reasonably well for the archives...
> I trust this weas a piece of sarcasm. I spoke to more than a few people
> at pgcon and nobody had a good word to say about the search system on
> the archives.
To some degree, the lack of a good search for the archives is half the
problem. Not that a better search would be a replacement for a bug
tracker, but it would go a long way.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2011-05-31 13:22:52|
|Subject: Re: Reducing overhead of frequent table locks|
|Previous:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2011-05-31 13:07:50|
|Subject: Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project|