Re: "errno" not set in case of "libm" functions (HPUX)

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: "errno" not set in case of "libm" functions (HPUX)
Date: 2011-05-27 22:10:02
Message-ID: 1306534202.19157.4.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On tor, 2011-05-26 at 17:31 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > We could also do that globally, but that would probably be something
> for
> > the next release.
>
> Hmm. I'm a bit scared of how much might break. I don't think the
> autoconf tests are generally designed to guarantee no warnings.

Yeah, I think you're right. Although one wonders why they have built-in
support for that. Might be worth trying sometime.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Browne 2011-05-27 22:10:37 Re: How can I check the treatment of bug fixes?
Previous Message Andres Freund 2011-05-27 21:54:35 Re: How can I check the treatment of bug fixes?