| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid losing track of data for shared tables in pgstats. |
| Date: | 2007-06-08 03:09:24 |
| Message-ID: | 13063.1181272164@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 06:09:36PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Gregory Stark wrote:
>>> When does this bug date to?
>>
>> It was in 8.1. I didn't verify whether it affects on 8.0; I think we
>> separated the shared tables in pgstats in 8.1, with the advent of
>> autovacuum, so I assume it doesn't.
> Doesn't appear to, at least not using the test case I found for 8.1
> and later.
Yeah, the separate hashtable for shared rels was added for 8.1:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2005-07/msg00627.php
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-06-08 18:23:53 | pgsql: Arrange for large sequential scans to synchronize with each |
| Previous Message | Michael Fuhr | 2007-06-08 02:28:39 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid losing track of data for shared tables in pgstats. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-06-08 05:39:58 | Re: TOAST usage setting |
| Previous Message | Michael Fuhr | 2007-06-08 02:28:39 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid losing track of data for shared tables in pgstats. |