Re: TEXT vs PG_NODE_TREE in system columns (cross column and expression statistics patch)

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Subject: Re: TEXT vs PG_NODE_TREE in system columns (cross column and expression statistics patch)
Date: 2011-04-28 15:20:07
Message-ID: 1304003607-sup-7783@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from Boszormenyi Zoltan's message of jue abr 28 11:03:56 -0300 2011:
> Hi,
>
> attached is the WIP patch for cross-column statistics and
> extra expression statistics.
>
> My question is that why pg_node_tree is unusable as
> syscache attribute? I attempted to alias it as text in the patch
> but I get the following error if I try to use it by setting
> USE_SYSCACHE_FOR_SEARCH to 1 in selfuncs.c.
> Directly using the underlying pg_statistic3 doesn't cause an error.

Two comments:
1. it seems that expression stats are mostly separate from cross-column
stats; does it really make sense to submit the two in the same patch?

2. there are almost no code comments anywhere

3. (bonus) if you're going to copy/paste pg_attribute.h verbatim into
the new files, please remove the bits you currently have in "#if 0".
(Not to mention the fact that the new catalogs seem rather poorly
named).

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2011-04-28 15:21:39 Re: TEXT vs PG_NODE_TREE in system columns (cross column and expression statistics patch)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-04-28 15:19:19 Re: TEXT vs PG_NODE_TREE in system columns (cross column and expression statistics patch)