On tis, 2011-03-29 at 23:48 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> The line I marked in pg_basebackup.c might be an actual problem: It
> goes through a whole lot to figure out the timeline and then doesn't
> do anything with it.
This hasn't been addressed yet. It doesn't manifest itself as an actual
problem, but it looks as though someone had intended something in that
code and the code doesn't do that.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2011-04-27 16:57:05|
|Subject: Re: gcc 4.6 warnings -Wunused-but-set-variable|
|Previous:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2011-04-27 15:58:31|
|Subject: Re: unknown conversion %m|