On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 00:01 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Both "%lld" and "%I64d" can be used with mingw to print 64 bit integers.
> However, modern versions of gcc spit warnings with the former, and not
> the latter. However, since "%lld" works, it is chosen by our config
> setup since it comes first in the list of formats tried. Therefore, to
> keep the compiler happy I proposed to rearrange that so that "%I64d" is
> preferred if it's found to work.
We should prefer the standard syntax (%lld) over nonstandard ways.
There could just as well be platforms that accept %I64d but warn about
it (as being nonstandard).
If that doesn't work for a specific platform, either adjust the test so
that it checks for warnings, or just manually override the result in
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Merlin Moncure||Date: 2011-04-27 13:32:48|
|Subject: Re: Fail to search in array, produced by subquery - is it a bug?|
|Previous:||From: Dimitri Fontaine||Date: 2011-04-27 12:48:22|
|Subject: Re: Extension Packaging|