Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off
Date: 2011-04-25 21:10:38
Message-ID: 1303765838.5006.66.camel@vanquo.pezone.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On mån, 2011-04-25 at 15:26 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, it's not just to be "helpful", it's to close off code paths that
> are never going to be sufficiently well-tested to not have bizarre
> failure modes.  That helps both developers (who don't have to worry
> about testing/fixing such code paths) and users (who won't have to
> deal with the bizarre failure modes). 

That's of course another good reason.



In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Darren DuncanDate: 2011-04-25 21:28:50
Subject: Re: "stored procedures" - use cases?
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-04-25 21:08:16
Subject: Re: wrong hint message for ALTER FOREIGN TABLE

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group