| From: | Shianmiin <Shianmiin(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [BUGS] PostgreSQL backend process high memory usage issue |
| Date: | 2011-04-13 20:09:00 |
| Message-ID: | 1302725340009-4301555.post@n5.nabble.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-general |
Merlin Moncure-2 wrote:
>
>
> ... I've coded a
> lot of multi schema designs and they tend to either go the one
> session/schema route or the connection pooling route. Either way,
> cache memory usage tends to work itself out pretty well (it's never
> been a problem for me before at least). I can't recall anyone ever
> even complaining about it in a non synthetic test.
>
>
It's good to know that. Many thanks to your help. :)
--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/PostgreSQL-backend-process-high-memory-usage-issue-tp4289407p4301555.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-04-13 20:39:16 | Re: BUG #5974: UNION construct type cast gives poor error message |
| Previous Message | Shianmiin | 2011-04-13 20:07:16 | Re: [BUGS] PostgreSQL backend process high memory usage issue |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-04-13 20:14:11 | Re: Memory management in Postgres |
| Previous Message | Jorge Arévalo | 2011-04-13 20:07:31 | Re: Memory leak in SPI_finish call |