Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Major features for 9.1

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Major features for 9.1
Date: 2011-04-06 17:39:48
Message-ID: 1302111588.3238.17.camel@vanquo.pezone.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On ons, 2011-04-06 at 19:13 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 19:10, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> > On fre, 2011-04-01 at 12:21 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> Here's a list of the features which seem to me to be major enough to
> >> be
> >> headliners for 9.1.  Please mark which ones you think are major/not
> >> major/not major and anything you think I've forgotten.
> >
> > I guess it's not really a big feature, but the functional dependency
> > tracking feature that allows trimming down GROUP BY lists will
> > significantly cut down on questions and "bug reports" from especially
> > MySQL converts.
> 
> Are you sure? Many of the cases I've come across aren't covered by it,
> because they're not actually functional dependencies... They're just
> using the "give me whatever row you can think of feature" in mysql. So
> while this certainly helps, I'm ont sure it will make a significant
> cut in the number of questions...

Yes, many cases will still not work, but many will.


In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Jeff DavisDate: 2011-04-06 18:01:03
Subject: Re: Major features for 9.1
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2011-04-06 17:13:57
Subject: Re: Major features for 9.1

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group