| From: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Joseph Adams <joeyadams3(dot)14159(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers ML <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: psql 9.1 alpha5: connection pointer is NULL |
| Date: | 2011-04-03 08:34:49 |
| Message-ID: | 1301819689.2945.1.camel@lenovo01-laptop03.gunduz.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 2011-04-02 at 18:10 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> It could explain Devrim's report if the parameters passed by psql had
> some problem that was detectable by conninfo_array_parse(). That
> seems a bit unlikely, but I did think of one possibility: if Devrim
> was
> testing 9.1 psql with a 9.0 libpq (perhaps due to an rpath issue)
> then 9.0 libpq would spit up on client_encoding, which wasn't a legal
> connection parameter in 9.0.
Bingo:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/pgsql-9.1/lib/ psql -p 5433
worked. Let me fix the rpms.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2011-04-03 09:32:34 | Re: Should psql support URI syntax? |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2011-04-03 07:30:18 | FDW state from plan time |