On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 13:00 -0400, Dan Ports wrote:
> While looking into a SSI bug, I noticed that we don't actually display
> the pid of the holding transaction, even though we have that
> information available.
Is there a chance that the PID will reference a backend that has either
terminated or is idle? That might be confusing.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
| Next: | From: Kevin Grittner | Date: 2011-04-01 21:17:03 |
| Subject: Re: trivial patch: show SIREAD pids in pg_locks |
| Previous: | From: Alvaro Herrera | Date: 2011-04-01 20:09:49 |
| Subject: Re: Bug in autovacuum.c? |