On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 13:00 -0400, Dan Ports wrote:
> While looking into a SSI bug, I noticed that we don't actually display
> the pid of the holding transaction, even though we have that
> information available.
Is there a chance that the PID will reference a backend that has either
terminated or is idle? That might be confusing.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Kevin Grittner||Date: 2011-04-01 21:17:03|
|Subject: Re: trivial patch: show SIREAD pids in pg_locks|
|Previous:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2011-04-01 20:09:49|
|Subject: Re: Bug in autovacuum.c?|