On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 19:10 -0500, Joshua Berkus wrote:
> > I would think it would be purely syntatic sugar really, which does
> > incorporate a familiar interface for those who are working in
> > different
> > worlds (.Net/Drupal/JAVA) etc...
> 
> I wouldn't mind having something more standard supported; I'm always looking up the conninfo for the options I don't use frequently.
> 
> However, is there any standard for database URIs?

There is an IETF RFC for generic URI:

http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3986.txt

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

-- 
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt

In response to

• Re: Should psql support URI syntax? at 2011-04-01 00:10:36 from Joshua Berkus

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Greg Stark	Date: 2011-04-01 01:54:12
	Subject: Re: Bug in autovacuum.c?
Previous:	From: Christopher Browne	Date: 2011-04-01 00:39:25
	Subject: Re: Should psql support URI syntax?