| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Should psql support URI syntax? |
| Date: | 2011-04-01 00:49:22 |
| Message-ID: | 1301618962.24264.87.camel@jd-desktop |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 19:10 -0500, Joshua Berkus wrote:
> > I would think it would be purely syntatic sugar really, which does
> > incorporate a familiar interface for those who are working in
> > different
> > worlds (.Net/Drupal/JAVA) etc...
>
> I wouldn't mind having something more standard supported; I'm always looking up the conninfo for the options I don't use frequently.
>
> However, is there any standard for database URIs?
There is an IETF RFC for generic URI:
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3986.txt
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2011-04-01 01:54:12 | Re: Bug in autovacuum.c? |
| Previous Message | Christopher Browne | 2011-04-01 00:39:25 | Re: Should psql support URI syntax? |