Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Problem with pg_upgrade?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Problem with pg_upgrade?
Date: 2011-03-30 21:25:39
Message-ID: 1301520339.31317.8.camel@vanquo.pezone.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On ons, 2011-03-30 at 15:39 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On ons, 2011-03-30 at 10:57 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Also, I am unclear if this is really our bug.  At least one of the
> > > systems was on Ubuntu/Debian, and they might both have been, and I know
> > > Debian changes our source code.  Where can I find a copy of the diffs
> > > they have made?
> > 
> > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~pitti/postgresql/debian-9.0/files/head:/debian/patches/
> 
> These all seem reasonable, but I am confused by this.  Someone reported
> last week that the equals sign is not optional in postgreql.conf on
> Debian but I don't see that patch in here.

That's probably because some other tool processes to the configuration
file to find the data directory or something.

> Also I thought they modified
> pg_hba.conf in some odd way.  Are these changes no longer made in 9.0?

I think that was about 10 years ago.



In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2011-03-30 21:27:05
Subject: Re: Problem with pg_upgrade?
Previous:From: Jeff DavisDate: 2011-03-30 20:58:33
Subject: Re: Problem with pg_upgrade?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group