Excerpts from Dimitri Fontaine's message of mié mar 30 05:27:07 -0300 2011:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > Why are you worrying with the non-PGXS build chain anyway? Just assume
> > that the module is going to be built with PGXS and things should just
> > work.
> > We've gone over this a dozen times in the past.
> I'm not sure why we still support the pre-PGXS build recipe in the
> contrib Makefiles, and didn't want to change that as part as the
> extension patch series, but I think we should reconsider.
This is in the archives somewhere. I think it's something to do with
the fact that "make check" doesn't work under PGXS; you have to use
"make installcheck". Or maybe it was something else. I don't really
remember the details. I also pushed for this, a long time ago.
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: David Fetter||Date: 2011-03-30 13:28:11|
|Subject: Re: Another swing at JSON|
|Previous:||From: Luca Ferrari||Date: 2011-03-30 13:13:12|
|Subject: 9.0.3 SIGFAULT on FreeBSD with dtrace|