Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Another swing at JSON

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: Joseph Adams <joeyadams3(dot)14159(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Another swing at JSON
Date: 2011-03-30 13:27:39
Message-ID: 1301491580-sup-8458@alvh.no-ip.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Dimitri Fontaine's message of mié mar 30 05:27:07 -0300 2011:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > Why are you worrying with the non-PGXS build chain anyway?  Just assume
> > that the module is going to be built with PGXS and things should just
> > work.
> >
> > We've gone over this a dozen times in the past.
> 
> +1
> 
> I'm not sure why we still support the pre-PGXS build recipe in the
> contrib Makefiles, and didn't want to change that as part as the
> extension patch series, but I think we should reconsider.

This is in the archives somewhere.  I think it's something to do with
the fact that "make check" doesn't work under PGXS; you have to use
"make installcheck".  Or maybe it was something else.  I don't really
remember the details.  I also pushed for this, a long time ago.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: David FetterDate: 2011-03-30 13:28:11
Subject: Re: Another swing at JSON
Previous:From: Luca FerrariDate: 2011-03-30 13:13:12
Subject: 9.0.3 SIGFAULT on FreeBSD with dtrace

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group