| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | Joseph Adams <joeyadams3(dot)14159(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Another swing at JSON |
| Date: | 2011-03-30 13:27:39 |
| Message-ID: | 1301491580-sup-8458@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Dimitri Fontaine's message of mié mar 30 05:27:07 -0300 2011:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > Why are you worrying with the non-PGXS build chain anyway? Just assume
> > that the module is going to be built with PGXS and things should just
> > work.
> >
> > We've gone over this a dozen times in the past.
>
> +1
>
> I'm not sure why we still support the pre-PGXS build recipe in the
> contrib Makefiles, and didn't want to change that as part as the
> extension patch series, but I think we should reconsider.
This is in the archives somewhere. I think it's something to do with
the fact that "make check" doesn't work under PGXS; you have to use
"make installcheck". Or maybe it was something else. I don't really
remember the details. I also pushed for this, a long time ago.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2011-03-30 13:28:11 | Re: Another swing at JSON |
| Previous Message | Luca Ferrari | 2011-03-30 13:13:12 | 9.0.3 SIGFAULT on FreeBSD with dtrace |