Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #5946: Long exclusive lock taken by vacuum (not full)

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #5946: Long exclusive lock taken by vacuum (not full)
Date: 2011-03-28 14:03:16
Message-ID: 1301320848-sup-4233@alvh.no-ip.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of lun mar 28 07:26:49 -0300 2011:
> Likely "too large" is more an issue related to available resources than
> of absolute figure.
> 
> On a penta byte of free storage I would not mind allocating some teras
> with extending a (large) table.
> If I'm left with some MB only, I'd be concerned for sure.

...

Does anybody have an idea just W-T-F happened here?  I did NOT send the
above email (as evidenced by it being signed by "Rainer").  I notice it
even has a "@commandprompt.com" message-id.  Should I start signing my
email?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2011-03-28 14:05:36
Subject: Re: BUG #5946: Long exclusive lock taken by vacuum (not full)
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2011-03-28 10:26:49
Subject: Re: BUG #5946: Long exclusive lock taken by vacuum (not full)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group