Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was terminated by signal

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Achilleas Mantzios <achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was terminated by signal
Date: 2007-01-28 15:00:08
Message-ID: 12999.1169996408@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-adminpgsql-patchespgsql-sql
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> To make the grammar match better it might be safer to put the text 
>> inside the parentheses and the number into the sentence.  That would 
>> also work better for translation.

> OK.  I will also add the number to the exec.c case by snprint into a
> local string in that block, and passing that to log_error.

I don't like that because it parenthesizes the most important part of
the message, which is a style-guideline violation at least in spirit.
How about

		... terminated by signal 10: Bus error

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Shane AmblerDate: 2007-01-28 17:16:06
Subject: Re: cluster or database?
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-01-28 14:28:47
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Gevik BabakhaniDate: 2007-01-28 15:37:37
Subject: Re: uuid patch 3.0 (8.3devel)
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-01-28 14:28:47
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was

pgsql-sql by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2007-01-28 17:21:50
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was terminated by signal
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-01-28 14:28:47
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group