Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Why our counters need to be time-based WAS: WIP: cross column correlation ...

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why our counters need to be time-based WAS: WIP: cross column correlation ...
Date: 2011-02-28 19:47:23
Message-ID: 1298922443.25659.10.camel@jd-desktop (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 11:39 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > Spitballing here, but could sqlite be an intermediate, compromise solution?
> 
> For a core PostgreSQL component ?!?!?

Sure, why not? It is ACID compliant, has the right kind of license, has
a standard API that we are all used to. It seems like a pretty decent
solution in consideration. We don't need MVCC for this problem. 

JD

> 
> -- 
>                                   -- Josh Berkus
>                                      PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
>                                      http://www.pgexperts.com
> 

-- 
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2011-02-28 19:52:42
Subject: Re: pl/python do not delete function arguments
Previous:From: Euler Taveira de OliveiraDate: 2011-02-28 19:47:22
Subject: Re: Why our counters need to be time-based WAS: WIP: cross column correlation ...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group