On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 21:55 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > From my own point of view, I'm not even sure what a "commercial abuse"
> > of the wiki would consist of. If a company wants to
> > advertise/brag/hype/promote a product which is based on Postgres on
> > the wiki, how is that a detriment to the project, exactly?
> Yeah, good point.
Exactly, we are known to be a commercially friendly project -- BSD
License and all.
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt
In response to
pgsql-www by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2011-02-27 08:45:02|
|Subject: Re: Top five challenges|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-02-27 02:55:27|
|Subject: Re: Wiki clarification|