Re: disposition of remaining patches

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: disposition of remaining patches
Date: 2011-02-26 00:57:03
Message-ID: 1298681823.6945.0.camel@jdavis-ux.asterdata.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 15:44 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Hmmm, I don't follow this. The user can only disable syncrep for their
> own transactions. If they don't care about the persistence of their
> transaction post-failover, why should the DBA care?

I think that's the difference between failover and switchover, right? At
least Slony makes such a distinction, as well.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2011-02-26 01:21:50 Re: disposition of remaining patches
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2011-02-26 00:52:56 Re: Sync Rep v17