Re: criticism about hosting download packages

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Susanne Ebrecht <miracee(at)web(dot)de>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: criticism about hosting download packages
Date: 2011-02-22 19:17:56
Message-ID: 1298402276.14800.16.camel@jd-desktop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www


> >> Yes it is. It has already been reported and I believe it won't change
> >> on the EDB side :-( (not to say that EDB was known to do that and get
> >> some unfortunate glitchs in the past)
> >> In our side, we can review the dowload area and add explanations for
> >> third parties packages ?
>
> Rah, sorry, it was supposed to be a dot not a question-mark.

The only way the EDB page will not be prominent is if the community
starts maintaining its own one-click packages that provide the same
level of functionality. Nobody has offered to put that effort in.

JD

--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cédric Villemain 2011-02-22 19:44:57 Re: criticism about hosting download packages
Previous Message Cédric Villemain 2011-02-22 13:09:39 Re: criticism about hosting download packages

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cédric Villemain 2011-02-22 19:44:57 Re: criticism about hosting download packages
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2011-02-22 18:19:14 Re: [Gforge-admins] [Fwd: [GENERAL] pgfoundry news page]