Re: a regression

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, marcin mank <marcin(dot)mank(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: a regression
Date: 2011-01-25 21:28:00
Message-ID: 1295990880.6430.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On tis, 2011-01-25 at 16:19 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> What would probably be reasonable to do is a one-time run over a lot
> of locales, and then collate the results to see how many distinct
> outputs we see and over what sets of locales. Then we could make some
> reasoned decisions about which cases are worth carrying variant
> expected files for.

We already did that and the current state is the result of that.

http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/200901111254.03722.peter_e@gmx.net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2011-01-25 21:56:27 Re: SSI patch version 14
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2011-01-25 21:22:59 Re: SSI patch version 14