On lör, 2011-01-01 at 17:21 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > I don't see anything wrong with having 20 or 30 messages of variants of
> > "foo cannot be used on bar"
> > without placeholders.
> Well, that's OK with me. It seems a little grotty, but manageably so.
> 1. Should we try to include the name of the object? If so, how?
Hmm. There is a bit of a difference in my mind between, say,
constraints cannot be used on sequences
constraint "foo" cannot be used on sequence "bar"
the latter leaving open the question whether some other combination
> 2. Can we have a variant with an SQL-command-fragment parameter?
> %s cannot be used on views
> where %s might be CLUSTER, DROP COLUMN, etc.
That's OK; we do that in several other places.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Jim Nasby||Date: 2011-01-02 22:11:25|
|Subject: Re: contrib/snapshot|
|Previous:||From: Dimitri Fontaine||Date: 2011-01-02 21:24:27|
|Subject: Re: Base Backup Streaming|