On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 10:35 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > Frankly, if Simon hadn't already submitted code, I'd be pushing for
> > single-standby-only for 9.1, instead of "any one".
> Yes, we are awfully late, but let's not panic.
Yes, we're about a year late. Getting a simple feature like this into
the code could have been done in 9.0.
We must stop returning to overcomplex features, especially if they
aren't backed up with solid analysis of things like server availability
and query visibility.
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Valtonen, Hannu||Date: 2011-01-02 10:45:29|
|Subject: Support for negative index values in array fetching|
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2011-01-02 10:39:45|
|Subject: Re: Sync Rep Design|