| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: and it's not a bunny rabbit, either |
| Date: | 2010-12-31 13:52:49 |
| Message-ID: | 1293803569.19789.6.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On tor, 2010-12-30 at 11:49 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> ISTM there are four things we might potentially want to state in the
> error message: the feature/operation you tried to apply, the name of
> the object you tried to apply it to, the type of that object, and the
> set of object types that the feature/operation will actually work for.
I think the latter should be completely omitted unless it's
exceptionally important.
You can construct pretty silly things down this line:
ERROR: permission denied for relation "x"
ERROR: relation "x" does not exist
vs.
ERROR: you only have permission on relation a, b, c
ERROR: only the following relations exist: a, b, c
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-12-31 14:13:50 | Re: Sync Rep Design |
| Previous Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2010-12-31 13:48:41 | Re: Sync Rep Design |