Re: and it's not a bunny rabbit, either

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: and it's not a bunny rabbit, either
Date: 2010-12-30 17:06:02
Message-ID: 1293728479-sup-9574@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of jue dic 30 13:49:20 -0300 2010:

> One possibility is to break it down like this:
>
> ERROR: foo is a sequence
> DETAIL: Triggers can only be used on tables and views.
>
> This could still be emitted by a function such as you suggest, and
> indeed that would be the most practical way from both a consistency
> and code-size standpoint.

This seems good to me. There will only be as many messages as relkinds
we have, plus as many as "features" there are.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2010-12-30 17:26:12 Sync Rep Design
Previous Message Jan Urbański 2010-12-30 17:01:25 pl/python do not delete function arguments