Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: clog double-dip in heap_hot_search_buffer

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: clog double-dip in heap_hot_search_buffer
Date: 2012-05-02 16:19:04
Message-ID: 12936.1335975544@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Otherwise this seems like a good idea.

> Do you think I should apply this to 9.2, or wait until 9.3?

We're not at beta yet, and it seems pretty safe/self-contained, so
I have no objection to committing now.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jeff JanesDate: 2012-05-02 16:20:55
Subject: Re: Have we out-grown Flex?
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2012-05-02 16:16:45
Subject: Re: clog double-dip in heap_hot_search_buffer

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group