| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, Elliot Chance <elliotchance(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include <funcapi.h>) |
| Date: | 2010-12-27 17:50:45 |
| Message-ID: | 1293472245.11075.5.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On mån, 2010-12-27 at 12:33 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On a more general point, it would be useful to have some
> infrastructure for running quality checks like this and publishing the
> results. We should be way beyond the point where we rely on
> individuals doing this sort of stuff.
I had a Hudson service set up for things like this, but the hosting was
unreliable and then the thing faded away. I could try to revive it.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Satterwhite | 2010-12-27 17:57:14 | Help with trigger |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-12-27 17:50:02 | Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include <funcapi.h>) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-12-27 18:00:34 | Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include <funcapi.h>) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-12-27 17:50:02 | Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include <funcapi.h>) |