On tis, 2010-11-30 at 14:20 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I agree, that argument is completely misconceived. If the DBA is
> paying enough attention to use LIMIT, s/he should be paying enough
> attention not to do damage in the first place. If that were the only
> argument in its favor I'd be completely against the feature.
I don't have any use for DELETE with LIMIT, but UPDATE with LIMIT could
be very useful if you are doing full-table updates and you don't have
enough space so you do it in chunks.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Alexey Klyukin||Date: 2010-12-01 19:46:48|
|Subject: Re: Another proposal for table synonyms|
|Previous:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2010-12-01 19:03:38|
|Subject: Re: We really ought to do something about O_DIRECT and
data=journalled on ext4|