Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #5774: VACCUM & REINDEX kills production environement

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Balamurugan Mahendran <balamurugan(at)adaptavant(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, depesz <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>, Bala Murugan <b2m(at)a-cti(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #5774: VACCUM & REINDEX kills production environement
Date: 2010-11-29 18:53:36
Message-ID: 1291056710-sup-3907@alvh.no-ip.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Excerpts from Balamurugan Mahendran's message of lun nov 29 13:48:43 -0300 2010:
> Thanks, I'll remove it. But I still get down time because of Vacuum(table
> lock). Is there any other better way to do this? I don't mind to switch to
> bigger instance with more Hardware.

I wonder if you're doing something other than INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE that
causes the service to "block" in the presence of VACUUM.  Maybe your
application is trying to do ALTER TABLE too frequently (or something
else entirely), which *would* block.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: David Quinn-JacobsDate: 2010-11-29 19:11:19
Subject: BUG #5775: DBLINK Connection String Truncation
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-11-29 18:27:38
Subject: Re: BUG #5761: In 'dblink' function connection string truncated

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group