Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: why does plperl cache functions using just a bool for is_trigger

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Postgres - Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: why does plperl cache functions using just a bool for is_trigger
Date: 2010-11-05 16:10:20
Message-ID: 1288973294-sup-6389@alvh.no-ip.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Jan Urbański's message of vie nov 05 04:19:07 -0300 2010:

> PS: I'm wondering if there's any noticable slowdown from always starting
> a subxact before doing SPI. Plperl users seemed not to notice, so I
> guess I shouldn't worry.

I think it's more "plperl users have to put up with it" rather than "not
notice".

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alexander KorotkovDate: 2010-11-05 16:15:55
Subject: Re: Fix for seg picksplit function
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2010-11-05 16:03:38
Subject: Re: ALTER OBJECT any_name SET SCHEMA name

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group