| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ALTER OBJECT any_name SET SCHEMA name |
| Date: | 2010-11-04 21:57:33 |
| Message-ID: | 1288907814-sup-2219@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Dimitri Fontaine's message of jue nov 04 16:42:53 -0300 2010:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > 2. I think the guts of AlterExtensionNamespace (the large switch block)
> > should be elsewhere, probably in alter.c
>
> That's implemented in the alter_extension patch v2, and that's much
> better, thanks for your continued input. Please note that it depends on
> the new set_schema.6.patch.
Hmm, seeing the amount of new includes in extension.c, I wonder if it'd
be better to move AlterExtensionNamespace to alter.c.
> (The problem with smaller patches is indeed the dependencies)
You can't please them all, I guess ...
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-11-05 01:00:41 | Re: timestamp of the last replayed transaction |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-11-04 21:56:46 | Re: lazy snapshots? |