Re: [PATCH] Custom code int(32|64) => text conversions
out of performance reasons
From:
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To:
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc:
pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:
Re: [PATCH] Custom code int(32|64) => text conversions
out of performance reasons
Date:
2010-11-02 07:13:58
Message-ID:
1288682038.30827.2.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com (view raw or flat )
Thread:
2010-10-31 21:41:50 from Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
2010-11-01 03:04:51 from Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-11-01 03:10:53 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-11-01 09:15:01 from Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
2010-11-02 00:37:43 from Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
2010-11-02 00:44:29 from Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
2010-11-02 07:13:58 from Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
2010-11-02 14:04:10 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-11-15 16:12:25 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-11-15 16:21:07 from Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
2010-11-19 21:16:19 from Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
2010-11-20 03:18:22 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-11-20 12:21:06 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-11-20 15:38:32 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-11-20 17:18:32 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-11-20 17:34:04 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-11-20 18:24:51 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-11-20 18:31:54 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-11-20 20:11:43 from Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
2010-11-20 20:21:20 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-12-03 12:31:56 from Florian Weimer <fweimer(at)bfk(dot)de>
2010-11-20 19:41:03 from Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
2010-11-20 19:47:20 from Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Lists:
pgsql-hackers
On sön, 2010-10-31 at 22:41 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> * I renamed pg_[il]toa to pg_s(16|32|64)toa - I found the names
> confusing. Not sure if its worth it.
Given that there are widely established functions atoi() and atol(),
naming the reverse itoa() and ltoa() makes a lot of sense. The changed
versions read like "string to ASCII".
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
Next :From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2010-11-02 07:28:06Subject : Re: SR fails to send existing WAL file after off-line copyPrevious :From : Vaibhav KaushalDate : 2010-11-02 06:34:35Subject : Fwd: Starting off with the development
