On sön, 2010-10-31 at 22:41 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> * I renamed pg_[il]toa to pg_s(16|32|64)toa - I found the names
> confusing. Not sure if its worth it.
Given that there are widely established functions atoi() and atol(),
naming the reverse itoa() and ltoa() makes a lot of sense. The changed
versions read like "string to ASCII".
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2010-11-02 07:28:06|
|Subject: Re: SR fails to send existing WAL file after off-line copy|
|Previous:||From: Vaibhav Kaushal||Date: 2010-11-02 06:34:35|
|Subject: Fwd: Starting off with the development|