Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> So as far as I can tell, no one is opposed to replacing "expr AS name"
>> with "name := expr" in the named-parameter syntax. Obviously we had
>> better get this done before beta2. Is anyone actually working on the
>> code/docs changes? If not, I'll pick it up.
> If we eventually are going to want to support the ANSI standard "=>"
> syntax, I am thinking we should just do it now. The larger question is
> what justification do we have of not supporting "=>".
Not breaking hstore, as well as any third-party modules that might be
using that operator name. Did you not absorb any of the discussion
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Pavel Stehule||Date: 2010-05-31 15:07:15|
|Subject: Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature|
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2010-05-31 14:43:20|
|Subject: Re: PG 9.0 release timetable|