Re: max_wal_senders must die

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: max_wal_senders must die
Date: 2010-10-28 20:23:27
Message-ID: 1288297407.22359.36.camel@jd-desktop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 07:05 -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 19:52 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> Josh Berkus wrote:
> >
> >>> *you don't know* how many .org users plan to implement
> >>> replication, whether it's a minority or majority.
> >>
> >> None of us know. What I do know is that I don't want PostgreSQL to
> >> be slower out of the box.
> >
> > Poll TIME!
>
> If you do take a poll, be careful to put in an option or two to deal
> with environments where there is "surgical" implementation of
> replication features.

And Poll it is:

https://www.postgresqlconference.org/content/replication-poll

You don't have to login to take it but of course it helps with validity
of results.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-10-28 21:19:40 Re: contsel and gist
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-10-28 20:10:44 Re: psql autocompletion for \z and \dg