| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Divakar Singh <dpsmails(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle |
| Date: | 2010-10-25 18:38:52 |
| Message-ID: | 1288031932.8930.32.camel@jd-desktop |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 11:36 -0700, Divakar Singh wrote:
>
> 68 Rows inserted: 100,000
> Above results show good INSERT performance of PG when using SQL
> procedures. But
> performance when I use C++ lib is very bad. I did that test some time
> back so I
> do not have data for that right now.
This is interesting, are you using libpq or libpqXX?
Joshua D. Drake
>
>
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-10-25 18:41:29 | Re: add label to enum syntax |
| Previous Message | Divakar Singh | 2010-10-25 18:36:24 | Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Divakar Singh | 2010-10-25 18:42:48 | Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle |
| Previous Message | Divakar Singh | 2010-10-25 18:36:24 | Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle |