| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Zach Bagnall <zach(dot)bagnall(at)bulletinwireless(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, radhika(at)88thstreet(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Postgresql Upgrade 7.4 to 8.2 |
| Date: | 2007-02-14 01:12:35 |
| Message-ID: | 1288.1171415555@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Zach Bagnall <zach(dot)bagnall(at)bulletinwireless(dot)com> writes:
>> Seriously though, the PITR recovery mechanism is quite mature and usable.
> I would say it is a good start - and progress is clearly being made. But
> it wont be "usable" for most serious applications until we have
> per-database transaction logging and backup recovery.
Don't hold your breath; that's not even on the agenda, much less
something that's likely to appear soon. If you need separable recovery
then run a different postmaster instance for each database.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-02-14 03:00:31 | Re: Postgresql Upgrade 7.4 to 8.2 |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2007-02-13 23:34:14 | Re: Question to safe way for minor update |