Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Docs for archive_cleanup_command are poor

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Docs for archive_cleanup_command are poor
Date: 2010-10-15 09:20:51
Message-ID: 1287134451.1725.1301.camel@ebony (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 18:05 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Agreed that there are no doc bugs.  The reason I suggested a backpatch
> > is that I'm concerned that a lot of people are going to be approaching
> > the whole Standby topic for the first time with 9.0, so it would be
> > nice to give those folks an accessible account of how
> > archive_cleanup_command is meant to be used.
> 
> Yeah, if this is a material improvement in the usefulness of the HS
> docs, I think including it into 9.0.x isn't a bad idea.

Done.

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services


In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2010-10-15 10:44:24
Subject: Re: formula about the number of WAL files
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2010-10-15 09:19:56
Subject: Re: formula about the number of WAL files

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Pavel StehuleDate: 2010-10-15 11:20:58
Subject: Re: string function - "format" function proposal
Previous:From: Radosław SmoguraDate: 2010-10-15 09:11:44
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Support for JDBC setQueryTimeout, et al.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group