| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>, Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace |
| Date: | 2000-01-25 08:20:20 |
| Message-ID: | 12871.948788420@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Thanks, but now I'm confused. I would have thought that aggregates went
> *before* the having clause,
Arrgh. You are right of course. Shouldn't pontificate late at night...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Julian Scarfe | 2000-01-25 08:30:36 | Re: [SQL] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace |
| Previous Message | Oliver Elphick | 2000-01-25 08:06:34 | Re: [HACKERS] Inheritance, referential integrity and other constraints |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Julian Scarfe | 2000-01-25 08:30:36 | Re: [SQL] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace |
| Previous Message | Philip Warner | 2000-01-25 07:54:59 | Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace |