On tis, 2010-09-28 at 13:53 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 13:50, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Shigeru HANADA
> >> The src/include/catalog/duplicate_oids script reports that 3037 ~
> >> 3040 are used two or more times.
> >> Though all regression tests finish successfully, should this be
> >> fixed ?
> > Woops. Thanks for the report, fixed. I wish we had a regression test
> > that would catch these mistakes. It's easy to forget to run this
> > script.
> Could we run the script as part of the regression tests? :-)
> Or if not, could we have the buildfarm run it?
I think it should actually be run as part of the regular build. Ever
since I started using git and developing like 10 features at once, and
other people doing the same, the chances of (hidden) OID conflicts is
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Geoghegan||Date: 2010-09-28 12:45:30|
|Subject: Re: Proposal: plpgsql - "for in array" statement|
|Previous:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2010-09-28 11:53:34|
|Subject: Re: security label support, revised|