Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: security label support, revised

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Shigeru HANADA <hanada(at)metrosystems(dot)co(dot)jp>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: security label support, revised
Date: 2010-09-28 12:03:06
Message-ID: 1285675386.20420.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On tis, 2010-09-28 at 13:53 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 13:50, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Shigeru HANADA
> >> The src/include/catalog/duplicate_oids script reports that 3037 ~
> >> 3040 are used two or more times.
> >>
> >> Though all regression tests finish successfully, should this be
> >> fixed ?
> >
> > Woops.  Thanks for the report, fixed.  I wish we had a regression test
> > that would catch these mistakes.  It's easy to forget to run this
> > script.
> 
> Could we run the script as part of the regression tests? :-)
> 
> Or if not, could we have the buildfarm run it?

I think it should actually be run as part of the regular build.  Ever
since I started using git and developing like 10 features at once, and
other people doing the same, the chances of (hidden) OID conflicts is
growing immensely.



In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter GeogheganDate: 2010-09-28 12:45:30
Subject: Re: Proposal: plpgsql - "for in array" statement
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2010-09-28 11:53:34
Subject: Re: security label support, revised

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group